FanIQ

FanIQ › Games

Game recap

Ravens @ Bills

2025 Wk 1 · BUF 41, BAL 40

A single game landing in the top 3 for combined scoring AND the top 10 for largest comeback is a genuine double outlier — most shootouts are decided early and stay lopsided; this one flipped from a 15-point deficit to a 1-point win.

2025's opener: 2nd-highest-scoring game of the year, plus a 15-point 4th-quarter comeback

Rare

Highest-scoring 2025 games (combined points)

RankMatchupScoreCombined
1CHI @ CINCIN 42, CHI 4789
2BAL @ BUFBUF 41, BAL 4081
3GB @ DALDAL 40, GB 4080

Largest 2025 comebacks (deficit overcome by the eventual winner)

RankMatchupFinal scoreDeficit overcome
1 (tie)PHI @ DALDAL 24, PHI 2121
1 (tie)BUF @ NE (Wk 15)NE 31, BUF 3521
10BAL @ BUF (Wk 1)BUF 41, BAL 4015

The Week 1 opener produced 81 combined points, 2nd-most of any game in 2025, and Buffalo's largest deficit in that game (15 points, trailing 34-19 in the third quarter) ranks among the season's top-10 comebacks.

Why it matters. A single game landing in the top 3 for combined scoring AND the top 10 for largest comeback is a genuine double outlier — most shootouts are decided early and stay lopsided; this one flipped from a 15-point deficit to a 1-point win.

Buffalo trailed 19-34 after three quarters, then outscored Baltimore 22-6 in the fourth to win by 1

Trend

Score at end of each quarter (BUF home, BAL away)

QtrBUFBAL
173
21020
31934
44140

Baltimore built a 20-10 lead by halftime and extended it to 34-19 through three quarters — a 15-point cushion entering the fourth. Buffalo then scored 22 fourth-quarter points to Baltimore's 6, completing the comeback to win 41-40.

Why it matters. A 15-point deficit with one quarter left is normally a near-certain loss; the fourth-quarter split (22-6) shows this wasn't a garbage-time field-goal rally against a defense playing prevent, it was a genuine full-quarter reversal.

Baltimore's offense was excellent all game; Buffalo just ran twice as many second-half plays

Split

First half vs second half efficiency

TeamHalfPlaysEPA/playSuccess%
BALH1280.43960.7%
BALH2220.31836.4%
BUFH1270.09748.1%
BUFH2500.30950.0%

Baltimore's offense was efficient throughout (0.439 EPA/play in the first half, 0.318 in the second), which is consistent with a team that led for three quarters. Buffalo ran nearly twice as many second-half plays (50) as first-half plays (27) as it played from behind, and its efficiency nearly tripled from 0.097 to 0.309.

Why it matters. Baltimore didn't collapse — its per-play numbers stayed strong all game, which means Buffalo's comeback wasn't a story of the opponent falling apart, it was Buffalo generating enough extra snaps and efficiency (0.309 EPA/play on 50 second-half plays) to outscore a team that was still playing well.

Baltimore's Week 1 offense ran far hotter than the team it would be the rest of 2025

Comparison

In-game EPA/play vs each team's 2025 season average (this game excluded)

TeamThis game EPA/playThis game success%Season avg EPA/playSeason NFL rankDelta vs own average
BAL0.38650.0%0.01512th+0.371
BUF0.23549.4%0.1283rd+0.107

Baltimore finished 2025 with a middling 12th-ranked offense (0.015 EPA/play across its other 16 games), but opened the season at 0.386 — a +0.371 deviation, the largest same-game swing of any team in this sample. Buffalo, the eventual 3rd-ranked offense, was already close to its real level in Week 1 (+0.107).

Why it matters. Baltimore's Week 1 number reads, in hindsight, as a mirage relative to the team's actual 2025 level — a useful reminder that season-opening performances (with no prior-week form to check against) are exactly the games most likely to overstate a team's real baseline.

FanIQ answers any NFL stats question with receipts, on your phone.

Get FanIQ freeGet it on Google Play

One law a week, in your inbox

A single rule from the library with the seasons behind it. Nothing else.