FanIQ

FanIQ › Teams

Team

Atlanta Falcons

NFC South

A losing streak this shape is its own trap: never bad enough to reset, never good enough to matter. The five straight 7-and-8-win seasons mean Atlanta has drafted in the middle, sold hope every September, and delivered the same January silence every year. What history says about long non-winning runs is blunt: the cellar always has occupants, but they rotate, and the exit usually comes faster than fans fear. Atlanta is now well past the usual exit window.

Stuck at 8 wins

Eight straight seasons without a winning record. In the whole NFL, only the Jets have been waiting longer.

Trend

Falcons by season, 2018-2025 (regular season)

SeasonRecord
20187-9
20197-9
20204-12
20217-10
20227-10
20237-10
20248-9
20258-9

Longest active waits for a winning season, through 2025

TeamLast winning seasonSeasons since
NYJ201510
ATL20178
CAR20178
ARI20214
LV20214
TEN20214

Atlanta's last winning season and last playoff trip both came in 2017. Since then: eight straight seasons at .500 or below, including five in a row at exactly 7 or 8 wins. They never bottomed out into a top-3 draft slot and never broke through, the most stubborn stretch of in-between football in the league. Only the Jets, at ten seasons and counting, have a longer active wait.

Why it matters. A losing streak this shape is its own trap: never bad enough to reset, never good enough to matter. The five straight 7-and-8-win seasons mean Atlanta has drafted in the middle, sold hope every September, and delivered the same January silence every year. What history says about long non-winning runs is blunt: the cellar always has occupants, but they rotate, and the exit usually comes faster than fans fear. Atlanta is now well past the usual exit window.

The pass rush is fixed? Atlanta jumped from 31st to 4th in sack rate in one season. History says most of that jump gets handed back.

ATL defensive sack rate by season (regular season)

SeasonSack rateNFL rank
20213.0%32nd
20223.6%32nd
20237.1%19th
20245.1%31st
20259.7%4th

Defenses that jumped from 25th-or-worse to top-5 in sack rate, 1999-2024

CohortTeamsNext season
Jumped 25th+ to top-522avg rank 16.5; only 8 of 22 stayed top-10

For years the Falcons could not touch the quarterback: dead last in sack rate in 2021 and 2022, 31st as recently as 2024. Then 2025 happened: 9.7% of opposing dropbacks ended in a sack, 4th in the NFL. Before penciling that in for 2026, look at the 22 defenses since 1999 that made the same leap from 25th-or-worse into the top 5: the next year they averaged a 16.5th-place finish, and only 8 of the 22 stayed in the top 10. Sack totals are the flashiest defensive stat and the least likely to repeat.

Why it matters. MYTH TEST: the folklore says a breakout sack season announces a new identity. The data says sack rate is the flimsiest defensive signature there is, driven by matchups, script, and a handful of splash games. There is real nuance here: a team's sack rate does carry some year-to-year signal, so the 2025 rush is not a mirage, but the specific top-5 finish is the part history keeps taking back. Expect a good rush, not a 4th-ranked one.

History's call for 2026: more of the middle. Expect Atlanta somewhere between 6 and 10 wins, again.

ATL 2025 profile (regular season)

MeasureValue
Record8-9
Point differential-48
Expected wins from points7.2
One-score games5-5
Games decided by 9+3-4

How far teams move the following season, 1999-2024

This season's finishTeam-seasonsAvg move next season
Within about 1.5 wins of .5002982.5 wins
In between2903.0 wins
4+ wins from .5002413.8 wins

The idea that an 8-9 team is coiled to break hard in either direction gets the standings backwards. Since 1999, teams finishing within about 1.5 wins of .500 moved an average of just 2.5 wins the following season, the smallest swing of any group; the wild jumps belong to the extremes snapping back. Atlanta's 2025 was the definition of the middle: 8-9 with a -48 point differential, 7.2 expected wins, and a 5-5 record in the close ones. Nothing in the profile argues for a leap. The gradeable call: Atlanta finishes 2026 between 6 and 10 wins.

Why it matters. WHAT HAPPENS NEXT: middle-of-the-pack teams sit where the league's gravity already pulls everyone, so they move less than anyone else year over year. Atlanta has now finished with 7 or 8 wins five seasons running, the purest expression of that gravity in football. The points, the close-game ledger, and the differential all agree with the record, which means there is no hidden luck to unwind in either direction.

How the Falcons play

Nobody lines up heavy like Atlanta, and nobody gets less out of it. The most extra-blocker snaps in football, at a loss on both the run and the pass.

Split

Heaviest-personnel offenses, 2023-2025 (share of snaps with 2+ TEs or 2+ RBs)

RankTeamHeavy shareHeavy-set pass EPA/play
1ATL46.5%-0.030
2ARI43.1%+0.090
3KC42.2%+0.074
4PIT41.8%-0.068
5NE39.6%-0.072

ATL out of heavy personnel, 2023-2025

Play callSnapsEPA/play
Pass728-0.030
Run755-0.079

Atlanta plays with an extra tight end or running back on 46.5% of its snaps, the highest rate in the NFL over 2023-2025. The league-wide cheat code from those looks is the pass: the defense loads up for the run and the throw sails over it. Atlanta splits its heavy snaps almost evenly, 755 runs to 728 passes, even though its own passes from heavy sets outperform its runs by 0.049 EPA per play. And unlike Arizona and Kansas City, who mine real value from the same looks, Atlanta loses ground either way.

Why it matters. Personnel is a pre-snap tell, and Atlanta's tell says run more loudly and more often than anyone's. The heavy-look pass premium exists precisely because defenses believe the tell, which makes the even run-pass split from those groupings a standing donation: they buy the loaded box and then run into it anyway. This is a play-calling edge sitting in plain sight on their own film.

Atlanta runs the ball like a power team and gets nothing for it. 5th in the NFL in run rate, 19th in run efficiency.

Anomaly

Run rate vs run efficiency, 2023-2025 (regular season)

MetricATLNFL rank
Run-play share45.8%5th
Neutral-script run rate50.9%9th
Rush EPA/play-0.04519th
Rush success rate42.4%below avg

Most run-heavy offenses, 2023-2025, with their rush EPA

TeamRun %Rush EPARush EPA rank
BAL51.0%+0.0832nd
PHI49.0%+0.0574th
BUF46.9%+0.1071st
GB46.5%-0.00811th
ATL45.8%-0.04519th

Atlanta commits to the run more than all but four teams (45.8% of all plays, 9th in neutral situations), the profile of a team that wants to grind clock and impose its will. The other run-heavy offenses convert that commitment: Baltimore, Philadelphia and Buffalo all sit top-4 in rush EPA. Atlanta sits 19th at -0.045 EPA per carry. They run the most and gain the least of the bunch.

Why it matters. A run-first identity only works if the runs actually move the offense forward; otherwise it is just predictable. Atlanta keeps feeding a ground game that grades out as roughly league-average, which puts the offense behind the chains and into the obvious passing downs where the broken deep game cannot bail it out. The talent is real, the scheme leverage is not.

Atlanta wins first down and still loses third down. The 8th-best early-down offense owns the 3rd-worst conversion rate in football.

Anomaly

ATL 2025: early downs vs third down (regular season)

MeasureValueNFL rank
EPA/play on downs 1-2+0.0688th
Avg yards to go on 3rd down6.616th shortest
3rd-down conversion rate34.1%30th

Best early-down offenses of 2025, and how their 3rd downs went

Rank (early downs)TeamEarly-down EPA3rd-down conv %
1LA+0.16741.0%
2NE+0.13243.6%
3BUF+0.12046.3%
4DET+0.10339.0%
5DAL+0.08842.9%
8ATL+0.06834.1%

Third downs are usually won on first down: teams that gain early rarely face long, hard third downs. Atlanta did the early work in 2025, ranking 8th in EPA per play on downs 1 and 2 and setting up the 6th-shortest average third down in the league (6.61 yards to go). Then it converted just 34.1% of them, 30th in football, while every other top-8 early-down offense converted at 39% or better. The setup was elite; the finish was broken.

Why it matters. For most bad third-down teams the fix is upstream, on first and second down. Atlanta is the rare team where the third down itself is the problem: short distances, good field position, and still no conversion. That points the blame at the money-down dropback game, the same unit that shows up in the deep-ball numbers, rather than at the run-first foundation. It is a specific, unusual, and fixable failure signature.

Atlanta's red-zone finishing went from 31st to 5th in two years, while the offense between the 20s went nowhere. Trust the movement, not the finish.

Trend

ATL red-zone touchdown rate vs overall offense, by season

SeasonRZ TD rate (per snap)RZ rankOverall offense rank (EPA)
202118.1%24th28th
202217.6%20th14th
202315.5%31st26th
202418.4%17th13th
202521.8%5th24th

In 2023 Atlanta was one of the worst finishing teams in football, punching in a touchdown on just 15.5% of red-zone snaps (31st). Two years later it was 5th at 21.8%. Meanwhile the offense's overall EPA rank bounced from 26th to 13th and back down to 24th, with no relationship to the finishing number. The 2025 formula, a bottom-third offense propped up by top-5 finishing, is exactly the kind of split that history says does not hold.

Why it matters. Red-zone conversion feels like identity and grades like noise: extreme finishing rates, good or bad, tend to drift back to the middle the following year, while per-snap movement is what actually persists. That cuts both ways for Atlanta. The 2023 despair was overdone, and so is any 2026 optimism built on the 2025 finishing spike. The number that has to move is the 24th-ranked offense underneath it.

Atlanta plays its best football right before halftime, then comes out of the locker room and forgets how. 12th in the 2nd quarter, 27th in the 3rd.

Split

ATL offensive EPA/play by quarter vs NFL average, 2023-2025

QuarterATL EPANFL avgATL rank
1st-0.008-0.00918th
2nd+0.050+0.02212th
3rd-0.091-0.00627th
4th-0.069-0.03423rd

Worst 3rd-quarter offenses, 2023-2025

RankTeam3rd-Q EPA/play
27ATL-0.091
28HOU-0.131
29NYJ-0.140
30TEN-0.146
31CLE-0.192
32LV-0.243

In the 2nd quarter Atlanta's offense hums at +0.050 EPA per play, 12th in the league and well above the +0.022 average, scripted, in rhythm, moving. Then halftime hits and it craters to -0.091, 27th in football, a swing of 0.14 EPA per play. The unit that looks sharp on a scripted opening stretch can't find answers once the opponent adjusts at the break.

Why it matters. The first half is where the play-script lives and where coaches have a plan ready; the 3rd quarter is the adjustment quarter, and that is exactly where Atlanta collapses. A drop this steep right after halftime is a coaching-and-counterpunch tell, not a talent tell. Good teams come out of the locker room with answers, Atlanta comes out flat.

Where games are decided

Atlanta is the inverse of a clutch team: 9th in late-game offensive efficiency, 19th in actually winning the close ones.

Anomaly

Offensive EPA/play in competitive late situations, 2023-2025

RankTeamClutch EPA/playSnaps
1PHI+0.178300
2DAL+0.153263
3LA+0.143325
8MIA+0.051224
9ATL+0.043420

One-score game record (final margin <= 8), 2023-2025

RankTeamRecordWin %
1PHI24-972.7%
2PIT22-971.0%
3SEA18-966.7%
19ATL15-1746.9%

In competitive late-game situations (win probability 20-80%, 4th quarter or final 5 minutes) Atlanta's offense ranks 9th in the NFL at +0.043 EPA per play, and it logs 420 such snaps, the most of any team in football. Yet the Falcons go just 15-17 (46.9%, 19th) in one-score games. They run the most close-game reps, move the ball as well as almost anyone in those moments, and still lose more of them than they win.

Why it matters. Most teams chase clutch reputations they cannot back with efficiency; Atlanta has the opposite problem, a process that is genuinely good late and a win-loss ledger that does not reflect it. That gap usually lives in the margins clutch EPA does not capture: a missed kick, a defensive lapse, a turnover at the worst time. The efficiency says the offense is not why these games slip away.

The 2016 Falcons offense is still one of the 15 best of the last quarter century. Nothing Atlanta has fielded since comes close.

Milestone

Best offensive seasons by EPA/play since 1999

RankTeamSeasonOff EPA/play
1NE2007+0.258
2KC2018+0.243
3GB2011+0.228
13ATL2016+0.189

Atlanta's own best offensive seasons since 1999

SeasonOff EPA/playAll-time rank (1999-2025)
2016+0.18913th
2012+0.084133rd
2018+0.072158th

The Matt Ryan MVP offense of 2016 produced +0.189 EPA per play, the 13th-best offensive season of the last 27 years, in the company of prime Brady, Mahomes and Rodgers units. It carried Atlanta through a 36-20 playoff win over Seattle and a 44-21 demolition of Green Bay before the 34-28 Super Bowl loss to New England. The gap to the franchise's second-best season is a chasm: 2012 ranks 133rd all-time. That one year remains the outlier peak of the entire era.

Why it matters. Franchises are usually remembered for their best team, and Atlanta's best team was historically excellent on exactly one side of the ball. The 13th-best offense of a 27-year sample is a legitimate all-timer, which is what makes the Super Bowl collapse sting and the years since look so flat: the roster has never again ranked better than 13th for a season, and usually sits in the 20s. The 2016 tape is the franchise ceiling, and it is a high one.

FanIQ answers any NFL stats question with receipts, on your phone.

Get FanIQ freeGet it on Google Play

One law a week, in your inbox

A single rule from the library with the seasons behind it. Nothing else.