Team
New York Giants
NFC East
Records are points filtered through close-game luck, and the Giants got the worst filter in the league: seven one-score losses against a single one-score win. The margin says the floor of this team is higher than the standings admit, which changes how to read everything else about 2025, from the rookie quarterback's season to the staff's. Bad team, yes. Four-wins bad, no.
The 4-13 that lied
Four wins undersold this team. The scoring margin said seven.
AnomalyNYG 2025 (regular season)
| Measure | Value |
|---|---|
| Record | 4-13 |
| Point differential | -58 (-3.4 per game) |
| Expected wins from points | 6.9 |
| One-score games | 1-7 |
2025 teams with a worse margin and a better record
| Team | Point diff | Wins |
|---|---|---|
| CAR | -69 | 8 |
| MIA | -77 | 7 |
| NO | -77 | 6 |
| CIN | -78 | 6 |
| WAS | -95 | 5 |
| CLE | -100 | 5 |
| NYG | -58 | 4 |
The Giants were outscored by 58 points in 2025, which for an average team converts to about 6.9 wins. They won 4, because they went 1-7 in one-score games. Six teams finished with a worse scoring margin and a better record, including an 8-win Carolina team that was outscored by 69. By the one number that carries most reliably into next season, the margin, this roster played like a 7-win team wearing a 4-13 record.
Why it matters. Records are points filtered through close-game luck, and the Giants got the worst filter in the league: seven one-score losses against a single one-score win. The margin says the floor of this team is higher than the standings admit, which changes how to read everything else about 2025, from the rookie quarterback's season to the staff's. Bad team, yes. Four-wins bad, no.
Two Dart run games: the called keep stays on schedule, the scramble breaks games open.
SplitJaxson Dart on the ground, 2025 (regular season, kneels excluded)
| Play | Carries | EPA/carry | Success | Yards | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Designed keeps | 41 | +0.317 | 61.0% | 202 | 7 |
| Scrambles | 38 | +0.747 | 73.7% | 290 | 2 |
League baselines, 2025 (all QBs)
| Play | EPA/carry | Success |
|---|---|---|
| Designed keeps | -0.048 | 53.2% |
| Scrambles | +0.479 | 61.5% |
League-wide in 2025, the called quarterback run lost a sliver of value (-0.048 EPA per carry) while the scramble was worth nearly half a point (+0.479). Dart beat both numbers as a rookie. His 41 designed keeps returned +0.317 per carry with 7 touchdowns, and his 38 scrambles returned +0.747, well clear of an already-elite league average, with a 73.7% success rate. For a rookie on a four-win team, the legs were the offense's clearest plus.
Why it matters. The gulf between the two run types is the law of the position: scrambles happen into grass that has already opened, while a called keep has to beat a defense that guessed right. What is unusual is that Dart cleared the league bar on both, including seven scores on designed keeps. The caution is sample size: 79 meaningful carries is one season of a rookie the league has not fully schemed against yet.
Life behind the line
Almost nobody goes for it on 4th down more than the Giants, and it isn't working.
ComparisonMost 4th-down go-for-it attempts, 2018-2025 (reg season)
| Rank | Team | Attempts | Conv % | Conv rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | CAR | 242 | 52.5% | 21st |
| 2 | CLE | 238 | 47.9% | 31st |
| 3 | NYG | 237 | 51.1% | 25th |
| 4 | DET | 233 | 55.4% | 13th |
| 5 | CHI | 217 | 49.8% | 28th |
The Giants have gone for it on 4th down 237 times since 2018, the 3rd-most in the NFL, trailing only Carolina and Cleveland. But they convert just 51.1% of the time, 25th in the league. That is the opposite of a healthy aggressive profile: the teams that go for it this often and succeed (Detroit, 55.4%) are choosing their spots; the Giants are sitting next to Carolina, Cleveland, and Chicago, the league's other rebuild-era basement dwellers. High volume, low conversion is the math of teams that are constantly behind, not teams that are being smart.
Why it matters. Going for it often is only a virtue when you convert; otherwise it is a symptom. The Giants' company at the top of the attempt list (Carolina, Cleveland, Chicago) tells the story: these are teams trailing so often that punting feels pointless, so they go for it out of desperation and hand opponents short fields when they miss. Volume without efficiency is how a bad offense compounds its own bad field position.
The Giants' offense is the league's worst out of the gate, and it spends every game digging out.
SplitNYG offensive EPA/play by quarter, 2023-2025 (reg season)
| Quarter | EPA/play | NFL rank |
|---|---|---|
| 1st | -0.138 | 30th |
| 2nd | -0.088 | 27th |
| 3rd | -0.070 | 23rd |
| 4th | -0.053 | 18th |
Worst 1st-quarter offense, 2023-2025 (EPA/play)
| Rank | Team | Q1 EPA/play |
|---|---|---|
| 32 | NYJ | -0.232 |
| 31 | CLE | -0.163 |
| 30 | NYG | -0.138 |
| 29 | CAR | -0.115 |
| 28 | PIT | -0.112 |
The Giants script the worst openings in football. Their 1st-quarter offense ranks 30th at -0.138 EPA per play, and then it climbs every single quarter: 27th in the 2nd, 23rd in the 3rd, up to 18th in the 4th. That is a perfectly monotonic warm-up curve. By the time the offense looks merely below-average, it is the 4th quarter and they are usually already chasing the game. Whatever the opening 15-play script is supposed to do, it is doing the opposite.
Why it matters. First-quarter offense is the most coachable phase of a game, it runs on a pre-planned script with no in-game adjustments required, so being 30th there points at preparation and play-design, not just talent. An offense that is reliably worst-early and least-bad-late is one that spends every Sunday playing from behind, which feeds the desperation 4th-down tries and the lopsided home/away records. Fixing the slow start is the cheapest available improvement on the roster.
Deep balls and the record books
The Giants can throw the deep ball with anyone. They just can't stop it.
SplitNYG on 20+ air-yard throws, both sides, 2023-2025 (reg season)
| Side | EPA/play | Comp % | NFL rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offense (throwing deep) | +0.401 | 34.6% | 12th |
| Defense (defending deep) | +0.563 allowed | 42.5% allowed | 28th |
NYG deep passing offense by season, comp % and NFL rank
| Season | Deep att | Comp % | NFL rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 56 | 37.5% | 11th |
| 2024 | 57 | 26.3% | 28th |
| 2025 | 72 | 38.9% | 12th |
For a team with this little offense, the deep ball is the one thing the Giants do at a league-average-or-better clip: 12th in deep-pass EPA (+0.401) over the last three years, and a top-12 completion rate in two of those three seasons. The defense is the mirror image. It ranks 28th defending the same throw, surrendering +0.563 EPA and a 42.5% completion rate to opposing deep shots. The Giants will out-bomb you and then let you bomb them right back.
Why it matters. The deep ball is the highest-variance, highest-value play in football, and the Giants are net-negative on it because their coverage gives back everything the offense generates. A team that can hit the home-run throw but can't prevent it is built to lose track meets, the exact game script their slow starts and bad protection keep forcing them into. The single most valuable roster fix here is on the back end, not at receiver.
The two most improbable champions of the era wear blue.
MilestoneSuper Bowl winners with the fewest regular-season wins, 1999-2025
| Season | Team | Regular season |
|---|---|---|
| 2011 | NYG | 9-7 |
| 2007 | NYG | 10-6 |
| 2010 | GB | 10-6 |
| 2012 | BAL | 10-6 |
| 2001 | NE | 11-5 |
| 2005 | PIT | 11-5 |
Since 1999, exactly one champion finished its regular season with fewer than 10 wins: the 2011 Giants, at 9-7. Tied for the next-fewest: the 2007 Giants at 10-6, alongside the 2010 Packers and 2012 Ravens. The franchise that spent the mid-2020s at the bottom of the standings also owns the two least-decorated regular seasons ever to end with a title in this era, both built on the same January formula: get in, then get hot.
Why it matters. Both title teams were mediocre by regular-season measures right up until they were immortal, which is the strongest historical counterweight to reading a Giants rebuild as hopeless. The structural lesson is that a team that simply gets into the bracket is never as far from a parade as the standings imply. It is also a warning about the reverse inference: regular-season records, good or bad, say less about January than fans want them to.
FanIQ answers any NFL stats question with receipts, on your phone.
Get FanIQ freeGet it on Google Play